This morning on the way to our children’s school we listened to ‘Pedoman’ (Nur Islam Channel) and the topic discussed was Islamic Banking. The good Ustaz was explaining the virtue of the system and so on and so forth, which reminded me of my fourth year Islamic Economics course that I took ages ago.
Although I can’t recall 95 percent of what I had learnt during my early twenty’s, the one thing that I still remember is that the system is based on ‘profit and loss sharing’ and the prohibition of ‘riba’ (interest).
Now, a few days ago, I bought a car and took a car loan from one of Brunei’s Islamic finance institutions. I am no expert in Islamic banking so I asked the loan officer to explain to me the difference between the car loan offered by them and those offered by the conventional banks. Well, his answer was simply we’re Islamic! Well, that didn’t answer my question, I pointed out to him that the monthly payment for the loan was exactly the same as the monthly payment that I would need to pay if I were to use a conventional bank. It was only a matter of preference!
I did not want to press the poor guy partly for the fear of rejection of my loan application and partly I knew it was not his fault in the first place. I actually asked the same question to a number of that particular bank’s staff whenever I visited it and I always got the same answer. It makes me wonder whether the bank has ever given its staff a training course on Islamic banking. I feel sorry if it hasn’t and I think it should.
Anyway, somebody please explain to me how Islam are the Islamic banks in Brunei? Frankly, I don’t see the difference between them and any of the conventional banks, in terms of their operation. They may not be involved in the financing of any of the unislamic activities such as gambling, entertainment etc. but I think in terms of profit and loss sharing- which is the basis of the system, they only share the former but never the latter, which to me makes them no better than any conventional bank.
So, please prove me wrong.
Salaam.
Showing posts with label business. Show all posts
Showing posts with label business. Show all posts
Monday, 13 April 2009
Friday, 19 December 2008
Bruneians and their toys
As I said never say never again, I cannot resist in making some comments regarding the more stringent enforcement of down-payment for car purchases. Firstly, I say it’s about time! This should have been enforced many years ago. Secondly, before many of you hurl all sorts of negative remarks toward the ministry and its directive, I urge you to think twice. Believe you me, this policy is not about making the rich gets richer or the poor gets poorer (i.e. the argument that poor-people-now-can –no-longer-afford-to-buy-cars or make it ‘expensive cars’), in fact it is the opposite.
The previous lax in the enforcement has made many Bruneians spent what they could not afford. This is what we called ‘wealth illusion’. We think we are ‘wealthier’ because we can afford to buy new and big cars, without even batting an eyelash. When in actual fact, we have actually trapped ourselves into ‘debt-slavery’. Don’t many of you feel that the more you earn, the less you actually take home? I’m not going to talk about how the US started (and now many parts of the world) its recession, but in one line, it is really due to this slavery.
Anyway, it should also bring good news to consumers. I am predicting (well hoping actually) that this policy will have an impact on the price of cars in Brunei. [To economics students, don’t read the next paragraph, think about it for a moment :)]
The policy will reduce the demand for cars. If the car-dealers are behaving ‘normally’, they will have to knock down the prices of cars (hurray for me! as we need to buy one) at the expense of their profit margin and perhaps the commission of our friendly car-salespersons. Either that or the interest rates will be knocked down.
So, there. That’s what I think and ought to happen. I’d be quite surprised if it doesn’t. I don’t think the demand will be unchanged since there are already too many cars waiting (at home) to be driven by too few people in Brunei.
Next, credit cards please!
Salaam.
The previous lax in the enforcement has made many Bruneians spent what they could not afford. This is what we called ‘wealth illusion’. We think we are ‘wealthier’ because we can afford to buy new and big cars, without even batting an eyelash. When in actual fact, we have actually trapped ourselves into ‘debt-slavery’. Don’t many of you feel that the more you earn, the less you actually take home? I’m not going to talk about how the US started (and now many parts of the world) its recession, but in one line, it is really due to this slavery.
Anyway, it should also bring good news to consumers. I am predicting (well hoping actually) that this policy will have an impact on the price of cars in Brunei. [To economics students, don’t read the next paragraph, think about it for a moment :)]
The policy will reduce the demand for cars. If the car-dealers are behaving ‘normally’, they will have to knock down the prices of cars (hurray for me! as we need to buy one) at the expense of their profit margin and perhaps the commission of our friendly car-salespersons. Either that or the interest rates will be knocked down.
So, there. That’s what I think and ought to happen. I’d be quite surprised if it doesn’t. I don’t think the demand will be unchanged since there are already too many cars waiting (at home) to be driven by too few people in Brunei.
Next, credit cards please!
Salaam.
Monday, 17 November 2008
Melayu Mudah Lupa
Our Malaysian friends held a farewell dinner for us last night. After the delicious beriyani and rendang, as usual we talked and discussed about the current issues. Last night’s discussion was interesting as it revolved around the ‘malay dilemma’ topic. At the moment, as you and I know, the racial tension in Malaysia is quite pronounced.
There were two camps last night. One opinion was that it is the malays’ right to be given the privileges given the fact that it is the malay land and therefore, the non-malays should not have any right to demand what is not rightfully theirs. And the success of the non-malays is seen as the result of some ‘conspiracy’ against the malays which include the policies that seem to be in favour of the non-malays or rather disfavour the malays.
Another opinion however believes that it is actually the malays themselves who are not utilising the privileges and opportunities that are given to them to their great advantage. The fact is ‘Melayu Mudah Lupa’ (Malay Forget Easily – the title of Mahathir’s book). We forget why we are given those privileges. Believing that they are our rights, we don’t value them anymore. As a result, we don’t work as hard as the non-malays (who have to survive) and the non-malays have emerged to be more successful, cleverer and wealthier.
And for this reason, we believe that there should exist a healthy competitive environment for the malays to prove that they are as good as or in fact better than the non-malays.
In Brunei, Alhamdulillah, we still live harmoniously together. Partly I believe is due to our small population and partly due to our ideology of ‘Melayu Islam Beraja’ (Malay, Islamic, Monarchy). As a result, the competition between the malay and the non-malay in Brunei is less severe or almost non-existent. This however does not mean that the Brunei malay is immune from the symptom of forgetfulness. In fact, we even take many things for granted. Take the ‘Ali Baba’ syndrome in the business sector for example. We want to be rich easily and quickly. Instead of genuinely running a business, we sell or rent out our permits and licenses to foreigners. As a result, the number of Brunei malays who have become true entrepreneurs that we can be proud is less than the ten fingers in our hands as compared to the number of business establishments (especially ‘kedai runcit’, barbershops and tailor shops).
Another example relates to the work attitude of the Brunei malays. The five-tea-break-a-day routine becomes the culture in the government sector. The attitude of ‘karang tah’ has lost the government millions of dollars in terms of productivity and even revenue-generation. As a result, the government sector, which is the first employment choice of any Brunei malay, is slow, inefficient and backward so much so that it can take weeks to send a letter within one tiny district, and months for the results of a few applications. (Come on! What is our population again?)
I totally concur with Dr. Mahathir who said “it is not race or ethnicity but the culture which determines the performance (of the people)”. So, to succeed we must change our culture. It is difficult, of course. To hope that we Bruneians will realize and change ourselves is probably a big wishful thinking.
Therefore, we have to create an environment that can change our perception of our rights of being Brunei malays, our perception of running a business and our perception of work – ‘work to live’ versus ‘live to work’ for our family and our country. We must look towards work as the true reward and take pride in our work, for without pride there may not be progress. This kind of environment may involve monetary reward but the reward should not outweigh the satisfaction of the achievement being made.
We have been blessed with oil and gas. We forget that this will not last forever. While the current generation probably cannot change, the next generation needs to change. We have to ensure that the next generation understands their purpose in life (which sadly is not understood by the current one). It is not an easy task but it has to be done.
Salaam.
There were two camps last night. One opinion was that it is the malays’ right to be given the privileges given the fact that it is the malay land and therefore, the non-malays should not have any right to demand what is not rightfully theirs. And the success of the non-malays is seen as the result of some ‘conspiracy’ against the malays which include the policies that seem to be in favour of the non-malays or rather disfavour the malays.
Another opinion however believes that it is actually the malays themselves who are not utilising the privileges and opportunities that are given to them to their great advantage. The fact is ‘Melayu Mudah Lupa’ (Malay Forget Easily – the title of Mahathir’s book). We forget why we are given those privileges. Believing that they are our rights, we don’t value them anymore. As a result, we don’t work as hard as the non-malays (who have to survive) and the non-malays have emerged to be more successful, cleverer and wealthier.
And for this reason, we believe that there should exist a healthy competitive environment for the malays to prove that they are as good as or in fact better than the non-malays.
In Brunei, Alhamdulillah, we still live harmoniously together. Partly I believe is due to our small population and partly due to our ideology of ‘Melayu Islam Beraja’ (Malay, Islamic, Monarchy). As a result, the competition between the malay and the non-malay in Brunei is less severe or almost non-existent. This however does not mean that the Brunei malay is immune from the symptom of forgetfulness. In fact, we even take many things for granted. Take the ‘Ali Baba’ syndrome in the business sector for example. We want to be rich easily and quickly. Instead of genuinely running a business, we sell or rent out our permits and licenses to foreigners. As a result, the number of Brunei malays who have become true entrepreneurs that we can be proud is less than the ten fingers in our hands as compared to the number of business establishments (especially ‘kedai runcit’, barbershops and tailor shops).
Another example relates to the work attitude of the Brunei malays. The five-tea-break-a-day routine becomes the culture in the government sector. The attitude of ‘karang tah’ has lost the government millions of dollars in terms of productivity and even revenue-generation. As a result, the government sector, which is the first employment choice of any Brunei malay, is slow, inefficient and backward so much so that it can take weeks to send a letter within one tiny district, and months for the results of a few applications. (Come on! What is our population again?)
I totally concur with Dr. Mahathir who said “it is not race or ethnicity but the culture which determines the performance (of the people)”. So, to succeed we must change our culture. It is difficult, of course. To hope that we Bruneians will realize and change ourselves is probably a big wishful thinking.
Therefore, we have to create an environment that can change our perception of our rights of being Brunei malays, our perception of running a business and our perception of work – ‘work to live’ versus ‘live to work’ for our family and our country. We must look towards work as the true reward and take pride in our work, for without pride there may not be progress. This kind of environment may involve monetary reward but the reward should not outweigh the satisfaction of the achievement being made.
We have been blessed with oil and gas. We forget that this will not last forever. While the current generation probably cannot change, the next generation needs to change. We have to ensure that the next generation understands their purpose in life (which sadly is not understood by the current one). It is not an easy task but it has to be done.
Salaam.
Wednesday, 12 November 2008
Snail Mail
Can somebody from the Postal Department explain exactly the process of receiving/sending mails/parcels in Brunei, please?
Until today I still do not understand how it can take almost 3 weeks for a letter from the UK to be delivered to someone in Brunei. This happened many times to us. For example, about 3 weeks ago, we sent a letter to Brunei. It was an important document but not too important for us to fork 45GBP to send it through DHL. So, we sent using an express UK mail service. With a given tracking code, we could track the letter through the internet. It was express alright, the letter reached Brunei in 2 days time. Unfortunately, the tracking system only applied in the UK so its whereabouts in Brunei, God knew! Thinking that it should arrive in safe hands within a few days, we were happy.
We were wrong. 2 days ago, the intended recipient asked where the letter was. We were gobsmacked! Finally, today we were told the letter has now finally arrived. It took exactly 18 days: 1 day in UK, 1 day travel, 16 days in Brunei.
Really, the term ‘snail mail’ literally applies to Brunei mail. What happened?
I don’t know about anyone else but a good, reliable postal service is crucial in providing a healthy and conducive business environment. Millions of e-bay UK sellers, for example, depend on the reliability of the UK postal service to deliver the goods in timely manner. Sending anything ‘First Class’ will usually mean next-day delivery wherever you are in the UK (the first time I experienced this, it knocked my socks off! haha). And you can claim for compensation if item is lost or damaged by the Post Office. So if the e-bay VP who is now in Brunei knows about the postal service in Brunei, I’m sure he will devote half his talk about the importance of a reliable delivery system.
Anyway, this is one service that can and should be corporatized (Read: the salary of all employees will depend on their ability to send letters/parcels quickly) so hopefully it can become efficient. I hear it’s in the pipeline. So, a big GOOD LUCK wish from me!
Salaam.
Until today I still do not understand how it can take almost 3 weeks for a letter from the UK to be delivered to someone in Brunei. This happened many times to us. For example, about 3 weeks ago, we sent a letter to Brunei. It was an important document but not too important for us to fork 45GBP to send it through DHL. So, we sent using an express UK mail service. With a given tracking code, we could track the letter through the internet. It was express alright, the letter reached Brunei in 2 days time. Unfortunately, the tracking system only applied in the UK so its whereabouts in Brunei, God knew! Thinking that it should arrive in safe hands within a few days, we were happy.
We were wrong. 2 days ago, the intended recipient asked where the letter was. We were gobsmacked! Finally, today we were told the letter has now finally arrived. It took exactly 18 days: 1 day in UK, 1 day travel, 16 days in Brunei.
Really, the term ‘snail mail’ literally applies to Brunei mail. What happened?
I don’t know about anyone else but a good, reliable postal service is crucial in providing a healthy and conducive business environment. Millions of e-bay UK sellers, for example, depend on the reliability of the UK postal service to deliver the goods in timely manner. Sending anything ‘First Class’ will usually mean next-day delivery wherever you are in the UK (the first time I experienced this, it knocked my socks off! haha). And you can claim for compensation if item is lost or damaged by the Post Office. So if the e-bay VP who is now in Brunei knows about the postal service in Brunei, I’m sure he will devote half his talk about the importance of a reliable delivery system.
Anyway, this is one service that can and should be corporatized (Read: the salary of all employees will depend on their ability to send letters/parcels quickly) so hopefully it can become efficient. I hear it’s in the pipeline. So, a big GOOD LUCK wish from me!
Salaam.
Tuesday, 23 September 2008
Are We THAT Thick?
After reading the Brunei Times’ piece on ‘Mobile Phones as a symbol of social standing’, the first thought that came to my mind was just how thick we Bruneians can be. In this holy month, I know I shouldn't be having any negative thought but I’m seriously frustrated! But I honestly lost my head when I read a 36-year old civil servant admitted that “his eyes are closed when he pays for a new phone”. O Dear! What is wrong with us?!
[Let me Breathe…]
I don’t know how these people can afford to constantly buy the latest phones. But I suspect credit, be it credit card or bank loan, is the main mode of payment.
Well, I came across an article in Slate that talked about the role of credits in our everyday lives. It was interesting the way it likened credit to a leverage i.e. power that allows you lift a heavy stuff. In this case, credits make everything appear so cheap. Or another way of seeing it, without credit, things look expensive.
Don’t get me wrong, I am not totally against credit cards or even personal loans. There are times, especially when we are travelling, credit cards will come in very handy. Or for when budget is tight and your freezer suddenly dies on you, then the personal loan that is being offered in the shops, can help save your life. But to use credits just to prove that you have a high salary or to have the latest mobile phone or camera that even can rival James Bond’s is beyond me! It’s even worse if you are buying a new phone at the expense of your child’s school fee.
In these last few days of Ramadhan, I can imagine the ‘eyes-turn-blind’ shopping frenzies are at their peaks in Brunei.
This can lead to a disaster, not only to the poor (or shall I call ‘thick’) person’s life but also to the health of the economy. In fact, I believe this is also another culprit that contributes to the increasing number of claims of being ‘poor’ in Brunei.
So I say, please…… whoever or whichever authority is looking into the credit policy in Brunei, to look into this seriously. It is high time we put a credit rating system in place. What I mean is that you can’t just allow any Tom, Dick and Harry that has a blue payslip enters into a credit contract without a thorough check on his financial background.
Everyday in the news, we hear about ‘credit crunch’ happening globally that has even put those giant corporations down on their knees and even collapse. It all started from careless and inappropriate lending. Anyway, it probably is still a foreign term in Brunei, so let’s keep it that way.
Selamat Menyambut Hari Raya Aidil Fitri. Spend Wisely!
Salaam.
[Let me Breathe…]
I don’t know how these people can afford to constantly buy the latest phones. But I suspect credit, be it credit card or bank loan, is the main mode of payment.
Well, I came across an article in Slate that talked about the role of credits in our everyday lives. It was interesting the way it likened credit to a leverage i.e. power that allows you lift a heavy stuff. In this case, credits make everything appear so cheap. Or another way of seeing it, without credit, things look expensive.
Don’t get me wrong, I am not totally against credit cards or even personal loans. There are times, especially when we are travelling, credit cards will come in very handy. Or for when budget is tight and your freezer suddenly dies on you, then the personal loan that is being offered in the shops, can help save your life. But to use credits just to prove that you have a high salary or to have the latest mobile phone or camera that even can rival James Bond’s is beyond me! It’s even worse if you are buying a new phone at the expense of your child’s school fee.
In these last few days of Ramadhan, I can imagine the ‘eyes-turn-blind’ shopping frenzies are at their peaks in Brunei.
This can lead to a disaster, not only to the poor (or shall I call ‘thick’) person’s life but also to the health of the economy. In fact, I believe this is also another culprit that contributes to the increasing number of claims of being ‘poor’ in Brunei.
So I say, please…… whoever or whichever authority is looking into the credit policy in Brunei, to look into this seriously. It is high time we put a credit rating system in place. What I mean is that you can’t just allow any Tom, Dick and Harry that has a blue payslip enters into a credit contract without a thorough check on his financial background.
Everyday in the news, we hear about ‘credit crunch’ happening globally that has even put those giant corporations down on their knees and even collapse. It all started from careless and inappropriate lending. Anyway, it probably is still a foreign term in Brunei, so let’s keep it that way.
Selamat Menyambut Hari Raya Aidil Fitri. Spend Wisely!
Salaam.
Wednesday, 27 August 2008
Saturday, 28 June 2008
Road to Diversification
There has been another ‘exciting’ development in Brunei’s quest to diversify its economy (or I hope it is what we are doing), and that is Brunei wishes to be the ‘city in the garden’. Is this just a mere statement or is this a real project with plans and strategies already being formulated? If it is a real project, I would love to know and maybe contribute ideas but if it isn’t, then Brunei better do something about it because you can’t just announce to the world that you want to be something and not do it and expect the world to forget.
The thing about us in Brunei is that we love to make fancy headlines: ‘halal branding’, ‘heart of Borneo’, 'Kingdom of Unexpected Treasures', ‘service hub (ShuTT)’, ‘ICT park’, ‘offshore financial centre’, ‘Brunei Inc. (or something like that)’, just to name a few. Please don’t take me wrong, I’m not saying that we shouldn’t do this or we cannot dream big but I have yet to see the end products.
I think the main reason why we have not achieved anything in relation to these ‘fancy’ projects or actually ANY project is that there is a lack of detailed plan and strategies. Even if there is one, it is never shared with the public let alone debated. Even worse it is sometimes not even shared among the relevant agencies. As a result the public, including the private sector, do not understand, never mind contribute, and therefore the project is not appreciated and supported.
Take for example ‘halal branding’. Seriously, I don’t fully understand what is it that we want to do? What is our objective? Can it create massive employment? Can it increase food production? How much resources are we devoting? What is our problem? Why does it take so long? How can we help? Do we mean to say that ‘Brunei Halal’ is better that ‘Malaysia Halal’ or ‘Thailand Halal’? Because believe me, when I go to a shop abroad I only look for ‘Halal’ products. Taste and packaging play a more important role in my decision to buy a particular halal product.
I am no expert but I think it is high time that Brunei goes to the basic of development and economic diversification. Instead of devoting our energy and resources to fancy projects, wouldn’t it be better to concentrate in the actual production? I for one want to hear plans for massive agricultural production or fishery or any kind of manufacturing. It sounds boring but it is what we most need to survive. Do remember that we only have 25 years to turn our economy around. And that is not a very long time.
Salaam.
The thing about us in Brunei is that we love to make fancy headlines: ‘halal branding’, ‘heart of Borneo’, 'Kingdom of Unexpected Treasures', ‘service hub (ShuTT)’, ‘ICT park’, ‘offshore financial centre’, ‘Brunei Inc. (or something like that)’, just to name a few. Please don’t take me wrong, I’m not saying that we shouldn’t do this or we cannot dream big but I have yet to see the end products.
I think the main reason why we have not achieved anything in relation to these ‘fancy’ projects or actually ANY project is that there is a lack of detailed plan and strategies. Even if there is one, it is never shared with the public let alone debated. Even worse it is sometimes not even shared among the relevant agencies. As a result the public, including the private sector, do not understand, never mind contribute, and therefore the project is not appreciated and supported.
Take for example ‘halal branding’. Seriously, I don’t fully understand what is it that we want to do? What is our objective? Can it create massive employment? Can it increase food production? How much resources are we devoting? What is our problem? Why does it take so long? How can we help? Do we mean to say that ‘Brunei Halal’ is better that ‘Malaysia Halal’ or ‘Thailand Halal’? Because believe me, when I go to a shop abroad I only look for ‘Halal’ products. Taste and packaging play a more important role in my decision to buy a particular halal product.
I am no expert but I think it is high time that Brunei goes to the basic of development and economic diversification. Instead of devoting our energy and resources to fancy projects, wouldn’t it be better to concentrate in the actual production? I for one want to hear plans for massive agricultural production or fishery or any kind of manufacturing. It sounds boring but it is what we most need to survive. Do remember that we only have 25 years to turn our economy around. And that is not a very long time.
Salaam.
Thursday, 26 June 2008
Reality Bites....in Miri
Somebody sent me a link to a blog post by one of our Sarawakian friends. For the benefit of those who do not have a Multiply account, here it is:
We should be grateful that Brunei still maintains the fuel subsidy (I don't know when will that last though, and I'm not sure whether it is the most sensible and rational policy). Nevertheless, I'm sure Brunei is also affected by the policy change in Malaysia. Perhaps this effect will probably even bigger than an effect of a reduction in Brunei's fuel subsidy.
Too bad for a country that depends on too much import.
But that's reality. And reality bites.
Salaam
MONEY WITH A DIMINISHING VALUE by Zaidil
There is a sudden change in atmosphere in Miri city after the fuel price hike. There are less cars on the road. The shopping centres are less crammed and worst of all... there are not that many happy faces around. From what I sensed, it is just the beginning. The experts predicted that the trend is likely to continue that way for quite some time. So what do we do?
Nothing much I am afraid. If you are an optimist, you will say - work harder so that you can earn more to compensate for the diminishing value of the currency. At the rate the price of goods is increasing you have to earn at least 2 times what you earned a month ago in order to maintain the same level of lifestyle.By the end of this year, you have to earn 4 times what you earned in April. This week Abdullah has just announced that if you work in the govt, you are allowed to do a part time business. Wonder how will that affect the already inefficent govt agencies?
On the other hand, if you are a pessimist, you will start looking for scapegoats and punchbags to put the blame on.
The situation is however not all gloom and doom. The bright side of it all is that there is a lot less road accidents ever since the price hike was annunced and people started to use the public transport more. Actually last sunday was the first time that I went to Boulevard supermarket without anyone ramming my butt with the trolley. I had the entire supermarket for myself.
Another positive development is that people started to think of growing their own vegetables and rice which I think is not a bad idea at all. Myself, I am thinking of digging the document bag to search for that land title which my grand father left more than a decade ago. With a bit of luck the cockroaches have not been so hungry to savour the land title and I might be able to harvest my own Bario rice. Oh do I have to fly to Bario to grow Bario rice!!
We should be grateful that Brunei still maintains the fuel subsidy (I don't know when will that last though, and I'm not sure whether it is the most sensible and rational policy). Nevertheless, I'm sure Brunei is also affected by the policy change in Malaysia. Perhaps this effect will probably even bigger than an effect of a reduction in Brunei's fuel subsidy.
Too bad for a country that depends on too much import.
But that's reality. And reality bites.
Salaam
Sunday, 1 June 2008
Consumer Loyalty Switch
I received the email from RBA informing that they have achieved the e-ticketing target. So, what does that mean? Would they be able to improve their performance and sales? Because I can tell you that our loyalty to our national carrier has now been transferred to another, due to their poor service and sales strategy.
It happened about 4 weeks ago. When I received the (most) distressing news (ever in my whole life) from my sister, we wanted to fly home immediately, as in the very next day. It was on Saturday afternoon. I called RBA London and was answered by a machine saying that the office was now closed. I was shouting my heart out! This was Saturday afternoon in England! For goodness sake, why the BL**DY H*LL are you closed?!! Saturday in England is like THE day for business to make a lot of money.
Then we tried the RBA website. And guess what, the earliest travel date that I could book from their website was in the next 48 hours! I was gobsmacked! How ridiculous is this? RBA website is not some travel agent’s website trying to sell other airlines’ tickets. It is selling its own tickets, isn’t it? Why isn’t the website connected to their booking system? Honestly, I nearly fainted! Furthermore, the price it quoted me to travel in 3 days time (the earliest available seats) was double the normal ticket (about GBP1200 per person, if I’m not mistaken). Now where is the economics in that? Aren’t few cheaper seats better than empty seats? Charging higher fare for the last few seats is only justifiable and economically sound if there is no other airline travels to the same destination.
So, my husband calmed me down and suggested that I tried Singapore Airlines. Lo and behold! Within 5 minutes, the website gave me all the combinations of the travel dates that I could purchase, as early as the very next morning! And the prices…oh sweetness… (Thank You ALLAH!) were about GBP700 for an adult and about GBP500 for a child RETURN tickets inclusive of tax and services.
And YES, it was the double-decker Airbus 380. “WOW…” was the word uttered by my 2 daughters when they entered the aircraft.
And... RBA has lost in sales of 4 used-to-be loyal customers.
What I like even better is the fact that the SQ offered a straight, uninterrupted journey to/from Singapore, which is fantastic especially for my children. They get to have enough sleep. They sleep, we sleep. And therefore we wake up happy. Unlike RBA. We have to make a transit in Dubai, which honestly is the MOST annoying thing to do for travellers with children, especially the journey returning to London. Just imagine parents travelling with small children, who have to be woken up from their sleep- grumpy and tired, just to get off the aircraft and make a long walk along the Dubai airport just to board the aircraft again in 15 minutes. It is ridiculous!
And after sampling A380, with its fantastic uninterrupted, perfectly working personal screen in-flight entertainment [don’t even let me start on RBA’s in-flight entertainment! Which has to constantly be reset by the air-stewardess which results in my children getting angry and I (almost always) bang my head on the screens], my husband and I have promised ourselves that WHENEVER POSSIBLE, we will not use RBA for any long distance journey again. EVEN if there is a price difference. Because some things, such as COMFORT and peace of mind, are simply priceless.
I am no expert in airlines or even travel business but I’m sure it is all about satisfying customers. Plus the airline business is also in a perfect competition market. If RBA continues its shoddy sales strategy, funny flight route combinations and poor in-flight entertainment, I’m not surprised that it will be losing more and more of its customers.
Salaam.
It happened about 4 weeks ago. When I received the (most) distressing news (ever in my whole life) from my sister, we wanted to fly home immediately, as in the very next day. It was on Saturday afternoon. I called RBA London and was answered by a machine saying that the office was now closed. I was shouting my heart out! This was Saturday afternoon in England! For goodness sake, why the BL**DY H*LL are you closed?!! Saturday in England is like THE day for business to make a lot of money.
Then we tried the RBA website. And guess what, the earliest travel date that I could book from their website was in the next 48 hours! I was gobsmacked! How ridiculous is this? RBA website is not some travel agent’s website trying to sell other airlines’ tickets. It is selling its own tickets, isn’t it? Why isn’t the website connected to their booking system? Honestly, I nearly fainted! Furthermore, the price it quoted me to travel in 3 days time (the earliest available seats) was double the normal ticket (about GBP1200 per person, if I’m not mistaken). Now where is the economics in that? Aren’t few cheaper seats better than empty seats? Charging higher fare for the last few seats is only justifiable and economically sound if there is no other airline travels to the same destination.
So, my husband calmed me down and suggested that I tried Singapore Airlines. Lo and behold! Within 5 minutes, the website gave me all the combinations of the travel dates that I could purchase, as early as the very next morning! And the prices…oh sweetness… (Thank You ALLAH!) were about GBP700 for an adult and about GBP500 for a child RETURN tickets inclusive of tax and services.
And YES, it was the double-decker Airbus 380. “WOW…” was the word uttered by my 2 daughters when they entered the aircraft.
And... RBA has lost in sales of 4 used-to-be loyal customers.
What I like even better is the fact that the SQ offered a straight, uninterrupted journey to/from Singapore, which is fantastic especially for my children. They get to have enough sleep. They sleep, we sleep. And therefore we wake up happy. Unlike RBA. We have to make a transit in Dubai, which honestly is the MOST annoying thing to do for travellers with children, especially the journey returning to London. Just imagine parents travelling with small children, who have to be woken up from their sleep- grumpy and tired, just to get off the aircraft and make a long walk along the Dubai airport just to board the aircraft again in 15 minutes. It is ridiculous!
And after sampling A380, with its fantastic uninterrupted, perfectly working personal screen in-flight entertainment [don’t even let me start on RBA’s in-flight entertainment! Which has to constantly be reset by the air-stewardess which results in my children getting angry and I (almost always) bang my head on the screens], my husband and I have promised ourselves that WHENEVER POSSIBLE, we will not use RBA for any long distance journey again. EVEN if there is a price difference. Because some things, such as COMFORT and peace of mind, are simply priceless.
I am no expert in airlines or even travel business but I’m sure it is all about satisfying customers. Plus the airline business is also in a perfect competition market. If RBA continues its shoddy sales strategy, funny flight route combinations and poor in-flight entertainment, I’m not surprised that it will be losing more and more of its customers.
Salaam.
Saturday, 26 April 2008
Banks and Investment
The Minister of Finance II said:
However, I cannot help feeling envious towards Malaysia which has the SME Bank or Thailand which also has its own SME Development Bank (which incidently are the subsidiaries of their respective Finance Ministries) to look (solely) after their SMEs' development needs.
Salaam.
"The banking industry, in this country today, sits on over $13 billion in
public deposits, much of which invariably end up being invested offshore and
as these deposits represent a vital capital resource of the country, ideally
it should be deployed for the country's benefit"
I absolutely agree with him! And I also support his encouragement for the financial institutions to:
(here for full news)"...shift towards corporate lending and investment banking and wealth management
and other fee-based activities would be heeded and responded to not just in
letter but also in spirit by all financial institutions in the country."
However, I cannot help feeling envious towards Malaysia which has the SME Bank or Thailand which also has its own SME Development Bank (which incidently are the subsidiaries of their respective Finance Ministries) to look (solely) after their SMEs' development needs.
Salaam.
Friday, 18 April 2008
Rejuvenate Brunei's GLCs
What interests me the most, while browsing the World Trade Policy Review of Brunei, is this bit of information:
(Per cent of GDP, unless otherwise indicated)
Saving and investment 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Gross national savings 47.2 48.6 51.4 59.1 62.4
Gross domestic investment 21.3 15.1 13.5 11.4 10.4
Savings-investment gap 26.0 33.6 37.9 47.8 52.1
(sorry, I'm no good in pasting the Table. For the full set click here and I refer to Table 1.2)
The saving-investment gap is huge! And the gap is because there is too much saving and too little investment (which isn’t usually the case in many countries). Now, if you’re an economics student and using Year 1 Macroeconomics, you will know that this excessive saving means there is a capital account surplus which could lead to a glut in the economy which eventually could lead to a recession.
Now, my question is why oh why are we acting as if we do not have enough capital to move the economy? To be specific, we are acting as if we’re having a gap that is caused by too little saving and therefore needs an external financing i.e. the FDI. And I have the impression that we seem to be helpless without the FDI. Now, I’m not saying that FDI is not important and I’m sure I don’t have to enumerate the reasons why we need an FDI. What I’m trying to say is that, given the availability of excessive domestic capital, it is high time that Brunei should also place the importance of the domestic investment in the effort to diversify the economy.
Despite the excessive capital however, the private sector in Brunei is weak, both in terms of resources and expertise, to undertake any major domestic investment. Therefore it is imperative (and equally inevitable) for the government sector to assist the private sector development, in particular, to do the investing.
To tell you the truth, at the beginning I wanted to propose the establishments of government-linked companies (GLCs) the likes of Singapore, but then I remembered, we DO have GLCs! Unfortunately for some reasons our GLCs are very quiet (if not, I wouldn’t have forgotten hehe) and do not appear to be spearheading the investment efforts.
I’m sure by now, many of you will be saying that Brunei’s GLCs won’t work because their managers and Board of Directors are civil servants who lack business acumen, risk-averse, slow in decision-making and their investments mainly political as opposed to commercially motivated. TRUE! And for this precise reason, I believe we need to rejuvenate our GLCs by removing (or perhaps reducing) the number of civil servants in the companies. Let’s put true entrepreneurs and real managers. If we can’t find locals then for the love of Brunei, hire (the best money can buy) foreign experts! Because the lack of competent local human resource to drive the economy is our main problem in the first place (which is nothing to be ashamed of, given our small population and the current nature of our economy, however this does not mean that Brunei’s HR should forever be at the current state) and I don't see anything wrong in hiring foreign talents. Nevertheless, we should be using Singapore as an example. Singapore’s phenomenal economic growth is, after all, the result of its strategy of ‘state capitalism’.
Let’s face the fact, we are not exactly a foreign investment magnet and on its own, our private sector is too weak and too small to drive the economy. At the same time, our oil is depleting. Therefore, I believe the inevitable solution is for the government, through its GLCs, to assume a proactive role both in the entrepreneurial development and the economic diversification effort. For the GLCs to assume this role efficiently, they need to have adequate resources and most importantly become proper business entities which mean risk-taking and being competitive. It is time for the government to let go its domineering role in the GLCs’s decision-makings and to also take the risk. Because if it doesn’t, then the only alternative for Brunei is for us to pray (very hard) for oil to never runs dry.
Salaam.
(Per cent of GDP, unless otherwise indicated)
Saving and investment 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Gross national savings 47.2 48.6 51.4 59.1 62.4
Gross domestic investment 21.3 15.1 13.5 11.4 10.4
Savings-investment gap 26.0 33.6 37.9 47.8 52.1
(sorry, I'm no good in pasting the Table. For the full set click here and I refer to Table 1.2)
The saving-investment gap is huge! And the gap is because there is too much saving and too little investment (which isn’t usually the case in many countries). Now, if you’re an economics student and using Year 1 Macroeconomics, you will know that this excessive saving means there is a capital account surplus which could lead to a glut in the economy which eventually could lead to a recession.
Now, my question is why oh why are we acting as if we do not have enough capital to move the economy? To be specific, we are acting as if we’re having a gap that is caused by too little saving and therefore needs an external financing i.e. the FDI. And I have the impression that we seem to be helpless without the FDI. Now, I’m not saying that FDI is not important and I’m sure I don’t have to enumerate the reasons why we need an FDI. What I’m trying to say is that, given the availability of excessive domestic capital, it is high time that Brunei should also place the importance of the domestic investment in the effort to diversify the economy.
Despite the excessive capital however, the private sector in Brunei is weak, both in terms of resources and expertise, to undertake any major domestic investment. Therefore it is imperative (and equally inevitable) for the government sector to assist the private sector development, in particular, to do the investing.
To tell you the truth, at the beginning I wanted to propose the establishments of government-linked companies (GLCs) the likes of Singapore, but then I remembered, we DO have GLCs! Unfortunately for some reasons our GLCs are very quiet (if not, I wouldn’t have forgotten hehe) and do not appear to be spearheading the investment efforts.
I’m sure by now, many of you will be saying that Brunei’s GLCs won’t work because their managers and Board of Directors are civil servants who lack business acumen, risk-averse, slow in decision-making and their investments mainly political as opposed to commercially motivated. TRUE! And for this precise reason, I believe we need to rejuvenate our GLCs by removing (or perhaps reducing) the number of civil servants in the companies. Let’s put true entrepreneurs and real managers. If we can’t find locals then for the love of Brunei, hire (the best money can buy) foreign experts! Because the lack of competent local human resource to drive the economy is our main problem in the first place (which is nothing to be ashamed of, given our small population and the current nature of our economy, however this does not mean that Brunei’s HR should forever be at the current state) and I don't see anything wrong in hiring foreign talents. Nevertheless, we should be using Singapore as an example. Singapore’s phenomenal economic growth is, after all, the result of its strategy of ‘state capitalism’.
Let’s face the fact, we are not exactly a foreign investment magnet and on its own, our private sector is too weak and too small to drive the economy. At the same time, our oil is depleting. Therefore, I believe the inevitable solution is for the government, through its GLCs, to assume a proactive role both in the entrepreneurial development and the economic diversification effort. For the GLCs to assume this role efficiently, they need to have adequate resources and most importantly become proper business entities which mean risk-taking and being competitive. It is time for the government to let go its domineering role in the GLCs’s decision-makings and to also take the risk. Because if it doesn’t, then the only alternative for Brunei is for us to pray (very hard) for oil to never runs dry.
Salaam.
Friday, 28 March 2008
SME news
I guess I'm not alone in my view:
For the full news, click here. Meanwhile,
And for the above reason, I pray with all my heart that THIS is not another announcement.
Salaam.
"Brunei Darussalam needs to provide special funding to create an
environment where technology-based business ideas can flourish.
Technopreneurs said that it is difficult for them to expand as fast as they
wanted to due to lack of funding. They added that in Brunei if one does not have
the money to do it, then there is little chance of succeeding.
In the words of Tengku Farith Rithauddeen, the Group CEO and Co-Founder
of SKALI, "There should not be any fear of failing if we want to create
innovative products or services."
For the full news, click here. Meanwhile,
"Dato Paduka Timothy Ong also quoted His Royal Highness as saying in the same
interview that diversifying the economy is a lot more than making
announcements". (Click here)
And for the above reason, I pray with all my heart that THIS is not another announcement.
Salaam.
Wednesday, 26 March 2008
Money Can't Buy Me...Food
A few months ago I wrote a short post on the increasing world’s food price (see here). In the past few days however, a few readers have emailed and left comments in my tag-board, asking for my view.
Since I am not currently in Brunei, I really don’t know the extent to which the global food inflation is affecting Brunei. But I’m sure, like everywhere else in the world, Brunei consumers must have also feeling the heat. For the benefit of all (in case someone is not sure why food prices have gone up), there are a few contributing factors:
1. The increase in the world demand for food: Giant countries such as China and India, whose economies have grown tremendously now have put pressure on the world’s food demand. As a result of a higher standard of living (due to the increase in income), the people in these countries now can afford to buy a larger variety of food resulting in increasing prices of wheat, rice, milk etc.
2. Rising input price: The main problem is the oil price. The soaring oil price is affecting the food price mainly in 2 ways. One, it increases the cost of transportation (land and/or sea). Two, it increases the price of fertilizers. When oil price increases, gas price also increases. Gas is needed to produce food fertilizer. Hence, fertilizer’s price goes up, so does the food price.
3. Climate Change: Flood and draught in many parts of the world are affecting the supply of food. When the food supply cannot meet the increasing food demand, then of course prices of food will go up.
4. Other market distortion: If you have never heard of biofuel, then by now, you should. And apparently it is also causing the food price hike. Wheat and corn for example, are now being used to produce biofuel. As a result, their prices have gone up and thus affecting the prices of other food. This problem is further aggravated by the trade policy of the developed producing countries who refuse to allow free trade for these commodities.
So anyone reading this should now understand why suddenly they find food prices have gone up (and it is not solely because the retailers have gone super-greedy, although some may have taken an advantage). I would actually expect for the effect to be stronger in Brunei since Brunei highly depends on imported food and we don’t have any (many) local substitutes. It is worrying really, just a few weeks ago, the Philippines for instance failed to buy enough rice for its inventories as a result of sales restrictions of rice in Vietnam, India and Egypt. Indonesia, on the other hand, warns of an impending unrest due to the rise in the prices of meat and tofu. (A Soft WARNING of rice shortage in South East Asia has been issued! And there is also a danger of a shortage of powdered milk! SO Please BE WARNED).
What can the government do? I DO hope the relevant authorities in Brunei will not just sit and watch and see how it goes. Other government around the world have taken actions. UAE recently has announced its intention to build a six-month staple food reserves, subsidising food and price freeze. Russia and China, have also issued food price freeze.
A list of staple food in Brunei should, by now be constructed. While I don’t expect the government to subsidise ALL food but I do expect some food price subsidies/food security packages are being planned for Brunei’s staple food (in addition to rice and sugar) such as cooking oil, flour, milk, eggs, chicken(?) and other food (Anonymousfoe: I hardly think mayonnaise should be included hehe). And this would be THE time to impose some price ceilings. Otherwise, we may be in a BIG, BIG trouble.
My advise to anyone reading this (as my previous post) is DO NOT WASTE FOOD! And however small your backyard garden is, try to plant some vegetables. You just never know…
Anyway, the Financial Times is an excellent place to get further information and latest news on the soaring food price (click here).
Salaam.
Since I am not currently in Brunei, I really don’t know the extent to which the global food inflation is affecting Brunei. But I’m sure, like everywhere else in the world, Brunei consumers must have also feeling the heat. For the benefit of all (in case someone is not sure why food prices have gone up), there are a few contributing factors:
1. The increase in the world demand for food: Giant countries such as China and India, whose economies have grown tremendously now have put pressure on the world’s food demand. As a result of a higher standard of living (due to the increase in income), the people in these countries now can afford to buy a larger variety of food resulting in increasing prices of wheat, rice, milk etc.
2. Rising input price: The main problem is the oil price. The soaring oil price is affecting the food price mainly in 2 ways. One, it increases the cost of transportation (land and/or sea). Two, it increases the price of fertilizers. When oil price increases, gas price also increases. Gas is needed to produce food fertilizer. Hence, fertilizer’s price goes up, so does the food price.
3. Climate Change: Flood and draught in many parts of the world are affecting the supply of food. When the food supply cannot meet the increasing food demand, then of course prices of food will go up.
4. Other market distortion: If you have never heard of biofuel, then by now, you should. And apparently it is also causing the food price hike. Wheat and corn for example, are now being used to produce biofuel. As a result, their prices have gone up and thus affecting the prices of other food. This problem is further aggravated by the trade policy of the developed producing countries who refuse to allow free trade for these commodities.
So anyone reading this should now understand why suddenly they find food prices have gone up (and it is not solely because the retailers have gone super-greedy, although some may have taken an advantage). I would actually expect for the effect to be stronger in Brunei since Brunei highly depends on imported food and we don’t have any (many) local substitutes. It is worrying really, just a few weeks ago, the Philippines for instance failed to buy enough rice for its inventories as a result of sales restrictions of rice in Vietnam, India and Egypt. Indonesia, on the other hand, warns of an impending unrest due to the rise in the prices of meat and tofu. (A Soft WARNING of rice shortage in South East Asia has been issued! And there is also a danger of a shortage of powdered milk! SO Please BE WARNED).
What can the government do? I DO hope the relevant authorities in Brunei will not just sit and watch and see how it goes. Other government around the world have taken actions. UAE recently has announced its intention to build a six-month staple food reserves, subsidising food and price freeze. Russia and China, have also issued food price freeze.
A list of staple food in Brunei should, by now be constructed. While I don’t expect the government to subsidise ALL food but I do expect some food price subsidies/food security packages are being planned for Brunei’s staple food (in addition to rice and sugar) such as cooking oil, flour, milk, eggs, chicken(?) and other food (Anonymousfoe: I hardly think mayonnaise should be included hehe). And this would be THE time to impose some price ceilings. Otherwise, we may be in a BIG, BIG trouble.
My advise to anyone reading this (as my previous post) is DO NOT WASTE FOOD! And however small your backyard garden is, try to plant some vegetables. You just never know…
Anyway, the Financial Times is an excellent place to get further information and latest news on the soaring food price (click here).
Salaam.
Sunday, 23 March 2008
The Dilemma of SME Part 2
Other issues faced by the SMEs in Brunei are the small market size and the lack of production incentives. With our population of about 380,000 really does not make Brunei an attractive place for any production or businesses. The small market size is further aggravated by cheap competition from import and high local cost.
Of course, somebody would reply that Brunei's SMEs should not limit themselves to the domestic demand and therefore should explore the regional and even the world market. True. But in truth that is easier said than done. Heeks (1998) in his paper (click here) pointed a number of related problems. First, he pointed that Brunei is an island of wealth in the sea of local poverty, at least in Borneo island itself. But it is also true in the context of ASEAN. Brunei is the second wealthiest country after Singapore (measured by the GDP per capita) which is followed by Malaysia and then Thailand. The remaining ASEAN countries are all earning less than US$1000 per capita – they hardly can become our potential markets! Second, where regional markets exist, someone has got there first, producing high quality products at low cost, thus presenting entry barriers to new-comers especially, one that lacks competitiveness.
Now, I’m not trying to be negative but sometimes we have to be realistic. I believe, in order for our local (and weak) SMEs to take their chance in the regional market, let alone the global market, they need assistance. For example, they need to know just what types of products to produce (for e.g. products that have high import growth rates in the global market) given their capabilities. And then of course they will also need (continuous) help in the area of capacity building to increase the products’ competitiveness especially in terms of the quality. Now, my question is, have we got these in place?
OK before we go further into the discussion of providing supports for export-production, let’s first look at the supports for local production. What incentives are we giving to the local producers? You would probably be thinking of the recently reduced corporate tax. Is that enough? The corporate tax, first of all, is not payable by sole proprietorships, which makes up a large chunk of our private sector. And then there is the ‘pioneer status’ scheme, but then again does it apply to a large number of our local SMEs? Correct me if I’m wrong but I think both the corporate tax and the pioneer status scheme are more directed towards the attraction of foreign investors (which I am in support of!). Now, my question again, what then are the incentives we are giving to the local small and medium enterprises? Our SMEs don’t even have complete access to crucial information such as market demand, input costs, availability of sources of production so on and so forth! And so how do we expect our local SMEs to go abroad and compete when they are not even developed domestically.
Now, back to the issue of the small domestic market. How do we then overcome this problem? At the top of my head, we can do this in 2 ways. One, through the natural population increase, which would take AGES! And two, through migration. OK, maybe in our case, not migration per se but we need to find ways to attract foreigners to come and spend in the country. How? One, we need to increase the number of tourists coming to Brunei. The tourism department, from the looks of it, is putting a lot of effort into this. [It’s ashamed really, that the apparent lack of policy co-ordination among other departments somehow weakens the effort (perhaps another post on this one)]. Two, we can attract foreigners who have high purchasing power to come and stay in Brunei. Brunei, being a tax haven has already 'the' appealing factor for anyone to come and live in the country :). However, there is a larger policy implication which is related to another policy taboo – land and property foreign ownership. Now, I’m no expert on this but personally I don’t really see the harm in allowing foreigners, who can make ‘economic contributions’ to purchase properties for the sole purpose of occupation (see for example how Singapore is doing it). Just imagine the spin-off effects of this policy! We can expect a boom in the housing sector and the construction industry, and then of course, the increase in the demand for ALL goods and services which will have the desired direct effect on our local SMEs. Oh I can picture a shift in the aggregate demand for Brunei! (And only then we can seriously talk about providing world-class services be it in education, health etc..)
Oh dear, there’s so much to think of! I do hope I am NOT the only one thinking about this. And while thinking is good, but please for the love of Brunei, DO something about it. I will probably write more on this topic.
Salaam.
Of course, somebody would reply that Brunei's SMEs should not limit themselves to the domestic demand and therefore should explore the regional and even the world market. True. But in truth that is easier said than done. Heeks (1998) in his paper (click here) pointed a number of related problems. First, he pointed that Brunei is an island of wealth in the sea of local poverty, at least in Borneo island itself. But it is also true in the context of ASEAN. Brunei is the second wealthiest country after Singapore (measured by the GDP per capita) which is followed by Malaysia and then Thailand. The remaining ASEAN countries are all earning less than US$1000 per capita – they hardly can become our potential markets! Second, where regional markets exist, someone has got there first, producing high quality products at low cost, thus presenting entry barriers to new-comers especially, one that lacks competitiveness.
Now, I’m not trying to be negative but sometimes we have to be realistic. I believe, in order for our local (and weak) SMEs to take their chance in the regional market, let alone the global market, they need assistance. For example, they need to know just what types of products to produce (for e.g. products that have high import growth rates in the global market) given their capabilities. And then of course they will also need (continuous) help in the area of capacity building to increase the products’ competitiveness especially in terms of the quality. Now, my question is, have we got these in place?
OK before we go further into the discussion of providing supports for export-production, let’s first look at the supports for local production. What incentives are we giving to the local producers? You would probably be thinking of the recently reduced corporate tax. Is that enough? The corporate tax, first of all, is not payable by sole proprietorships, which makes up a large chunk of our private sector. And then there is the ‘pioneer status’ scheme, but then again does it apply to a large number of our local SMEs? Correct me if I’m wrong but I think both the corporate tax and the pioneer status scheme are more directed towards the attraction of foreign investors (which I am in support of!). Now, my question again, what then are the incentives we are giving to the local small and medium enterprises? Our SMEs don’t even have complete access to crucial information such as market demand, input costs, availability of sources of production so on and so forth! And so how do we expect our local SMEs to go abroad and compete when they are not even developed domestically.
Now, back to the issue of the small domestic market. How do we then overcome this problem? At the top of my head, we can do this in 2 ways. One, through the natural population increase, which would take AGES! And two, through migration. OK, maybe in our case, not migration per se but we need to find ways to attract foreigners to come and spend in the country. How? One, we need to increase the number of tourists coming to Brunei. The tourism department, from the looks of it, is putting a lot of effort into this. [It’s ashamed really, that the apparent lack of policy co-ordination among other departments somehow weakens the effort (perhaps another post on this one)]. Two, we can attract foreigners who have high purchasing power to come and stay in Brunei. Brunei, being a tax haven has already 'the' appealing factor for anyone to come and live in the country :). However, there is a larger policy implication which is related to another policy taboo – land and property foreign ownership. Now, I’m no expert on this but personally I don’t really see the harm in allowing foreigners, who can make ‘economic contributions’ to purchase properties for the sole purpose of occupation (see for example how Singapore is doing it). Just imagine the spin-off effects of this policy! We can expect a boom in the housing sector and the construction industry, and then of course, the increase in the demand for ALL goods and services which will have the desired direct effect on our local SMEs. Oh I can picture a shift in the aggregate demand for Brunei! (And only then we can seriously talk about providing world-class services be it in education, health etc..)
Oh dear, there’s so much to think of! I do hope I am NOT the only one thinking about this. And while thinking is good, but please for the love of Brunei, DO something about it. I will probably write more on this topic.
Salaam.
Wednesday, 19 March 2008
New SME Financing
When I read today's news (see here and here) I thought, oohh that was fast! (i.e. the response to my previous post) haha.
It was indeed a welcoming development made by the Standard Chartered Bank to offer a collateral-free Business Installment Loan. I don't know what the interest rate is, but I suspect it would probably be as high as the risk involved. SCB is, after all a commercial bank. The detail of the financing scheme can be found here.
However, the scheme is not for start-ups. It is meant for businesses which have been up and running for at least 3 years. Therefore, I hope our local businesses will only participate when it is absolutely necessary.
The issue of start-up financing, thus still remains.
Salaam.
It was indeed a welcoming development made by the Standard Chartered Bank to offer a collateral-free Business Installment Loan. I don't know what the interest rate is, but I suspect it would probably be as high as the risk involved. SCB is, after all a commercial bank. The detail of the financing scheme can be found here.
However, the scheme is not for start-ups. It is meant for businesses which have been up and running for at least 3 years. Therefore, I hope our local businesses will only participate when it is absolutely necessary.
The issue of start-up financing, thus still remains.
Salaam.
Sunday, 16 March 2008
The Dilemma of SME Part 1
I’ve wanted to write something about SMEs in Brunei because this is another topic which I feel has not been properly addressed and where (again) policies and solutions offered are not coordinated.
I agree that the government has been very supportive in the development of SMEs but I am not convinced with the effectiveness of the given supports. Let’s go back to 30 years ago when Brunei started a SME Loan scheme for Malay citizens in the mid 1970s, known as the EDB scheme which unfortunately did not result in many success stories.
The failure of the EDB scheme to create many SMEs is mainly because it wasn’t participated by the intended recipients. (More than 65% of the loan went to non-entrepreneurs for buildings of houses which were mainly for rentals – not exactly the type of business we are looking for). Why? This is mainly because the EDB required collateral which could not be provided by any would-be genuine entrepreneur who didn’t have the means to do so. And as a result the only group that was able to apply for the loan was mostly those in the government sector, who were NOT trained to be risk-takers and to become genuine entrepreneurs.
Fast forward to today. The EDB scheme is now being replaced by a few financing schemes offered by the Ministry of Industry and Primary Resources through the Brunei Islamic Bank. While the new schemes may no longer be utilized to build rental houses, yet they pose the same constraint (or perhaps even more strict) to Brunei start-ups – the need to provide some forms of collateral in order to participate in the schemes. Well, of course I don’t expect for the money to be distributed freely to anyone who claims to be an entrepreneur but I am also positive that there are Bruneians out there who really have some viable business ideas but do not have the means to meet the banks’ strict loan scrutiny. So, where can they go for help?
This issue of the lack of availability of credits to genuine entrepreneurs and/or if you think in the reverse order, the availability of credits to non-genuine entrepreneurs to me is very much related to the issue of the wide-emerging of ‘Ali-Baba’ businesses. It works in 2 ways. On the one hand, those who are able to obtain the loans, who are mostly government servants, create businesses under the names of their wives/husbands/children while the business itself is run by some foreigners. On the other hand, those who are not able to obtain any loan seek some foreign external investors, and this coupled with the lack of proper business direction and experience, eventually results in the formation of ‘Ali Baba’ firms. This partly explains why despite the growing number of SMEs over the years, the number of success stories is paltry.
Of course the issue of ‘Ali Baba’ businesses is, to a large extent, attributable to the attitude (laziness) and the mentality of our own people (easy money). I personally feel the government’s effort in developing ‘local rakyat melayu Brunei’ to be the champions in the business sector has backfired. Despite all local privileges and the policy of local contents in almost all government projects, the locals still have not changed their position. It makes me wonder whether the very reason Brunei locals have not developed in the business sector compared to non-locals, is due to the over-protectiveness of our policies (all sorts of policies! e.g. land policy, local content, public sector jobs etc.) towards the Brunei locals. How? Those who are excluded from such ‘privilege’ policies have to work for their survivals. To most of them, forming a business IS an economic necessity. This however is not the case for the local Brunei, who have always been pampered and secured with high-paying jobs. And at the same time, those non-locals who see some business opportunities but are not in the position of setting up their own proper businesses seek the locals who are more than willing to lend their names in exchange for some business equity.
This is the real dilemma and poses a challenge to policy formulation. On the one hand, we want to help the locals. On the other hand, how can we ensure that the locals will not abuse any new given support? Nevertheless, Brunei can no longer wait and see and hope for the best. Brunei is not as it was 30 years ago. Brunei NEEDS to diversify its economy and strengthen its private sector. And the private sector needs help.
Anyway, going back to the issue of obtaining start-up credits, I personally think that Brunei should explore the idea of ‘angel investors’ or the provision of ‘seed money’ to new entrepreneurs who have no means to adhere to the collateral requirements of the existing financing schemes. Of course the risk is high but as the saying goes, No Pain No Gain! And if the government is not ready to take the risk, then how can we expect the people to take similar risk?
And at the same time, the issue of ‘Ali Baba’ businesses need to be tacked ASAP. It is simply an economic disease that needs a remedy. I must admit, it is not an easy task as it involves the changing of attitude and mindset and also requires a strong coordination from different government departments. However, as long as the mentality of ‘easy money’ exists among the locals, no matter how sophisticated the supports to local SMEs are, Brunei’s hope to create local businesses may just remain a non-achievable long-term economic goal.
I will write more on SME-related issues. In the meantime, I welcome views from everyone.
Salaam.
I agree that the government has been very supportive in the development of SMEs but I am not convinced with the effectiveness of the given supports. Let’s go back to 30 years ago when Brunei started a SME Loan scheme for Malay citizens in the mid 1970s, known as the EDB scheme which unfortunately did not result in many success stories.
The failure of the EDB scheme to create many SMEs is mainly because it wasn’t participated by the intended recipients. (More than 65% of the loan went to non-entrepreneurs for buildings of houses which were mainly for rentals – not exactly the type of business we are looking for). Why? This is mainly because the EDB required collateral which could not be provided by any would-be genuine entrepreneur who didn’t have the means to do so. And as a result the only group that was able to apply for the loan was mostly those in the government sector, who were NOT trained to be risk-takers and to become genuine entrepreneurs.
Fast forward to today. The EDB scheme is now being replaced by a few financing schemes offered by the Ministry of Industry and Primary Resources through the Brunei Islamic Bank. While the new schemes may no longer be utilized to build rental houses, yet they pose the same constraint (or perhaps even more strict) to Brunei start-ups – the need to provide some forms of collateral in order to participate in the schemes. Well, of course I don’t expect for the money to be distributed freely to anyone who claims to be an entrepreneur but I am also positive that there are Bruneians out there who really have some viable business ideas but do not have the means to meet the banks’ strict loan scrutiny. So, where can they go for help?
This issue of the lack of availability of credits to genuine entrepreneurs and/or if you think in the reverse order, the availability of credits to non-genuine entrepreneurs to me is very much related to the issue of the wide-emerging of ‘Ali-Baba’ businesses. It works in 2 ways. On the one hand, those who are able to obtain the loans, who are mostly government servants, create businesses under the names of their wives/husbands/children while the business itself is run by some foreigners. On the other hand, those who are not able to obtain any loan seek some foreign external investors, and this coupled with the lack of proper business direction and experience, eventually results in the formation of ‘Ali Baba’ firms. This partly explains why despite the growing number of SMEs over the years, the number of success stories is paltry.
Of course the issue of ‘Ali Baba’ businesses is, to a large extent, attributable to the attitude (laziness) and the mentality of our own people (easy money). I personally feel the government’s effort in developing ‘local rakyat melayu Brunei’ to be the champions in the business sector has backfired. Despite all local privileges and the policy of local contents in almost all government projects, the locals still have not changed their position. It makes me wonder whether the very reason Brunei locals have not developed in the business sector compared to non-locals, is due to the over-protectiveness of our policies (all sorts of policies! e.g. land policy, local content, public sector jobs etc.) towards the Brunei locals. How? Those who are excluded from such ‘privilege’ policies have to work for their survivals. To most of them, forming a business IS an economic necessity. This however is not the case for the local Brunei, who have always been pampered and secured with high-paying jobs. And at the same time, those non-locals who see some business opportunities but are not in the position of setting up their own proper businesses seek the locals who are more than willing to lend their names in exchange for some business equity.
This is the real dilemma and poses a challenge to policy formulation. On the one hand, we want to help the locals. On the other hand, how can we ensure that the locals will not abuse any new given support? Nevertheless, Brunei can no longer wait and see and hope for the best. Brunei is not as it was 30 years ago. Brunei NEEDS to diversify its economy and strengthen its private sector. And the private sector needs help.
Anyway, going back to the issue of obtaining start-up credits, I personally think that Brunei should explore the idea of ‘angel investors’ or the provision of ‘seed money’ to new entrepreneurs who have no means to adhere to the collateral requirements of the existing financing schemes. Of course the risk is high but as the saying goes, No Pain No Gain! And if the government is not ready to take the risk, then how can we expect the people to take similar risk?
And at the same time, the issue of ‘Ali Baba’ businesses need to be tacked ASAP. It is simply an economic disease that needs a remedy. I must admit, it is not an easy task as it involves the changing of attitude and mindset and also requires a strong coordination from different government departments. However, as long as the mentality of ‘easy money’ exists among the locals, no matter how sophisticated the supports to local SMEs are, Brunei’s hope to create local businesses may just remain a non-achievable long-term economic goal.
I will write more on SME-related issues. In the meantime, I welcome views from everyone.
Salaam.
Friday, 7 March 2008
Leg Co: ..On Unemployment
I don't know whether to laugh or to cry when I read the reports (in the newspapers here and here and here) of the Leg Co Session today. It was quite disappointing really because there was nothing new. One minister asked the private sector to hire the locals, while the other asked the locals to work in the private sector. I have no problem with both suggestions. But I fail to understand why no minister was addressing the root of the problem, which to me is the remuneration gap in the public and the private sector.
The gap is huge! To know someone in the public sector, who has the same exact qualification with the same skill, is paid triple the amount one is getting in a private sector is really demotivating to anyone. I don't know about you but seriously somebody has to address this issue. As I said in my previous post it is not enough (and equally unfair) to ask the private sector raising their pay rate to the locals due to several reasons. First, our private sector consists largely of SMEs. Second, our SMEs are weak as highlighted by the Minister of the MIPR. And third, the productivity and the commitment of our locals are not exactly commendable.
Now, in my humble opinion it is inevitable and imperative for the government to intervene. Either reduce the remuneration scale in the public sector and/or prop up the remuneration in the private sector. My preference goes to the latter as I believe it would have a larger multiplier effect to the economy. Perhaps take this idea as some sort of 'employment' benefit as opposed to the 'unemployment' benefit. If you are thinking, more government spending and where can we get the fund to do this? Now, I think there is even a stronger need for the government to review the subsidy (especially the fuel subsidy :) Plus, I also think that the government would actually save by spending only some fraction supporting locals who work in the private sector as opposed to employing these locals in the public sector. And of course the direct effect it has on the private sector itself (as compared to the reduction of the corporate tax! No, I'm not going to make any comment on this one) It's a Win, Win situation, No?
With regards to the mind-set problem and the attitude of our local workers, I think the issue is not exclusive to the private sector. I'm sorry..but look at out public sector's employees! I honestly wonder how can you expect the locals to be in their best behaviour in the private sector which pays considerably less when those in the public sector are having the time of their lives and being paid more. And that is why I also think it is equally imperative for the public sector to practice a more realistic productivity-linked wage system.
Oh Well, I'm just in my own world and who am I to say. I don't even know why I'm racking my brain for this.
Salaam
The gap is huge! To know someone in the public sector, who has the same exact qualification with the same skill, is paid triple the amount one is getting in a private sector is really demotivating to anyone. I don't know about you but seriously somebody has to address this issue. As I said in my previous post it is not enough (and equally unfair) to ask the private sector raising their pay rate to the locals due to several reasons. First, our private sector consists largely of SMEs. Second, our SMEs are weak as highlighted by the Minister of the MIPR. And third, the productivity and the commitment of our locals are not exactly commendable.
Now, in my humble opinion it is inevitable and imperative for the government to intervene. Either reduce the remuneration scale in the public sector and/or prop up the remuneration in the private sector. My preference goes to the latter as I believe it would have a larger multiplier effect to the economy. Perhaps take this idea as some sort of 'employment' benefit as opposed to the 'unemployment' benefit. If you are thinking, more government spending and where can we get the fund to do this? Now, I think there is even a stronger need for the government to review the subsidy (especially the fuel subsidy :) Plus, I also think that the government would actually save by spending only some fraction supporting locals who work in the private sector as opposed to employing these locals in the public sector. And of course the direct effect it has on the private sector itself (as compared to the reduction of the corporate tax! No, I'm not going to make any comment on this one) It's a Win, Win situation, No?
With regards to the mind-set problem and the attitude of our local workers, I think the issue is not exclusive to the private sector. I'm sorry..but look at out public sector's employees! I honestly wonder how can you expect the locals to be in their best behaviour in the private sector which pays considerably less when those in the public sector are having the time of their lives and being paid more. And that is why I also think it is equally imperative for the public sector to practice a more realistic productivity-linked wage system.
Oh Well, I'm just in my own world and who am I to say. I don't even know why I'm racking my brain for this.
Salaam
Sunday, 17 February 2008
Which Bank? - Reply to Anonymous
I received this comment/question in my previous post. At first I just wanted to reply in the comment box but as I was typing, my reply got longer haha! So, I've decided to put this as today's post. The person has also gathered some information about banks in Brunei which I feel could be useful to those who are in the same situation as hers/his.
Hello Anonymous,
Thanks for regularly visiting this blog.With regard to your banking question, Gosh I don't know what to say really. I'm no expert to say one bank is better than the other (unless they pay me to hahaha) because each bank has its own services, charges etc.
Anyway, I think you have done your homework (i.e. comparing bank charges etc) and now what you need to think about is what services of a bank that you are looking for. Is it just for an everyday banking (where you can deposit/withdraw money at any time of the day) or is it for a long-term saving (such as time or fixed deposit)as dif banks have dif products.
Personally, I put my money in a few banks in Brunei. NOT because I'm rich (hehehe who knows one day?) but because of the different services. For instance, my gaji and my everyday banking is in 1 local bank (which has many ATM machines located in convenient places). For my regular saving I use another local bank which offers a better return than the first bank and also gives me freedom to withdraw the money whenever I want (unlike some local banks which require you to write a letter etc). For our time/fixed deposit we (my husband and I) use another bank which obviously offers the most competitive rate and islamic. And lastly, because I travel a few times in a year, it gives me a peace of mind to have a bank that I can access to wherever in the world. So I use 1 international bank which gives me this service (of course with a cost/fee). So, there you go!. 4 banks in all and I'm not even remotely close to being a millionaire hehehe.
With regard to my opinion of the banking service in Brunei, well I've had my shares of good/bad experiences and let's say generally I concur with the general opinion that banks= money leechers HAHAHA. But I tell you, with wit and proper research, you can beat these banks at their own game! The Rule of the Thumb however is to try NOT to borrow money from them. Or even if you have to (eg. credit card) you MUST always pay what you owe ON TIME.
I must say you all are very lucky that you don't get to be tangled up in a big-bad borrowing situation. Thanks to the government's directive on personal loan capping introduced a few years back. I tell you, it WAS madness! People were borrowing beyond their means the moment they were employed (in the government sector of course). And those borrowed money were spent mostly on some unnecessary items such as big, expensive cars and large and lavish weddings. (If there are people out there who borrowed for some worthy cause, then I respect.) They were even some idiots (sorry but I HAVE to use that word) who borrowed at 9% interest rate and put those money back in the bank in a form of fixed deposit which only had about 3-5% return. I mean HOW did these people think, is still beyond my comprehension!
Anyway, good luck with your new job and finding a good bank. And thanks again for reading this blog. My hope is that something good would come out of it. I never intend to belittle anyone. I just hope we Bruneians get to think before we do something that sometimes can be life-altering. Haha look I've become emotional!
Salaam.
P.S Anyone working in the banks are WELCOMED to sell their services *wink*
Which bank do you feel offers the best service here in Brunei? I just
started working and have been using the bank (TAIB) that my parents have
allocated - which is basically the normal you get the card - passbook, withdraw
your money but non-interest being accredited if I'm not mistaken.I realised, the
non-abundance of ATM machines available for TAIB which annoyed me to some extent especially when the nearest TAIB ATM machine has been out of cash. So I started to think about the competition, and did some research of my own by getting the tariff of charges, services offered through each banks' website. I found out that HSBC and Baiduri Bank have the most ATM machines here in Brunei. But then again when I check the tariffs/service charges for HSBC, it is shockingly steep!
Just having an ATM card is BND 20 per year, and if your balance falls below the
minimum thats another charge. Standard Chartered offers considerably less, with
BND 12 per year for the ATM card. Baiduri Bank however did not disclose their
tariffs/service charges - sometimes it makes me wonder if that is why they have
been cited as the "Bank of the Year" by the Banker's magazine. "Bank of the
Year" in this context is which Bank gets the most profits in the country -
typically from ATM charges, services charges and foreign exchanges transactions
- possibly from Investments, I'm not quite sure. Should I just stick to TAIB
Bank, no-frills account with the free ATM card, no penalties whatsoever for
having only the minimum balance? I would be happy to know your views - it could be insightful to read.
Hello Anonymous,
Thanks for regularly visiting this blog.With regard to your banking question, Gosh I don't know what to say really. I'm no expert to say one bank is better than the other (unless they pay me to hahaha) because each bank has its own services, charges etc.
Anyway, I think you have done your homework (i.e. comparing bank charges etc) and now what you need to think about is what services of a bank that you are looking for. Is it just for an everyday banking (where you can deposit/withdraw money at any time of the day) or is it for a long-term saving (such as time or fixed deposit)as dif banks have dif products.
Personally, I put my money in a few banks in Brunei. NOT because I'm rich (hehehe who knows one day?) but because of the different services. For instance, my gaji and my everyday banking is in 1 local bank (which has many ATM machines located in convenient places). For my regular saving I use another local bank which offers a better return than the first bank and also gives me freedom to withdraw the money whenever I want (unlike some local banks which require you to write a letter etc). For our time/fixed deposit we (my husband and I) use another bank which obviously offers the most competitive rate and islamic. And lastly, because I travel a few times in a year, it gives me a peace of mind to have a bank that I can access to wherever in the world. So I use 1 international bank which gives me this service (of course with a cost/fee). So, there you go!. 4 banks in all and I'm not even remotely close to being a millionaire hehehe.
With regard to my opinion of the banking service in Brunei, well I've had my shares of good/bad experiences and let's say generally I concur with the general opinion that banks= money leechers HAHAHA. But I tell you, with wit and proper research, you can beat these banks at their own game! The Rule of the Thumb however is to try NOT to borrow money from them. Or even if you have to (eg. credit card) you MUST always pay what you owe ON TIME.
I must say you all are very lucky that you don't get to be tangled up in a big-bad borrowing situation. Thanks to the government's directive on personal loan capping introduced a few years back. I tell you, it WAS madness! People were borrowing beyond their means the moment they were employed (in the government sector of course). And those borrowed money were spent mostly on some unnecessary items such as big, expensive cars and large and lavish weddings. (If there are people out there who borrowed for some worthy cause, then I respect.) They were even some idiots (sorry but I HAVE to use that word) who borrowed at 9% interest rate and put those money back in the bank in a form of fixed deposit which only had about 3-5% return. I mean HOW did these people think, is still beyond my comprehension!
Anyway, good luck with your new job and finding a good bank. And thanks again for reading this blog. My hope is that something good would come out of it. I never intend to belittle anyone. I just hope we Bruneians get to think before we do something that sometimes can be life-altering. Haha look I've become emotional!
Salaam.
P.S Anyone working in the banks are WELCOMED to sell their services *wink*
Wednesday, 16 January 2008
Fuel Subsidy, Again.
I'm quite disappointed with the comments made by the acting Chairman of BEDB. As an economist and an entrepreneur, it is actually the least I expected from him. A few days ago he did mention that Brunei should stand up and face the economic challenges and be prepared to changes and be more adaptable to changes. Well, this is a challenge! If Bruneians can face this challenge, then let's bring the others...
First of all, he didn't seem to acknowledge that car fuel, at times when global prices are rising, is not a necessity. True, people's lives will be affected as the cost of driving a car will go up due to a reduction in subsidy and it will also affect the prices of goods. But I believe people will react by economising not only the use of their cars but also their day to day purchases down to the level of necessity. It would certainly be a different matter, if the government were to reduce the level of subsidy on electricity (but again Bruneians DO NOT economise their electricity usage).
Now, if the government were to decide to go ahead with the slashing of the fuel subsidy, the relavant government agencies should come forward to alleviate the effects on the lives of Bruneians. Firstly, this is when Price Control should be THE active policy in regulating the prices of necessities. Price ceilings of goods which are deemed staple MUST be worked out NOW so that sellers do not take advantage of the increasing fuel price.
Secondly, the Ministry of Education and/or the Ministry of Communication for instance, should come forward in helping parents transporting their children to school. School buses have to be provided and preferably privatised. This will not only directly help the people but also can help boost the transportation industry.
According to the Minister of Energy, about B$500 million was spent on the fuel subsidy in 2005. Again, that's A LOT! The money could be spent on other productive activities including in providing the resources for the above-mentioned activities. But the one use that can directly help the weak private sector and perhaps nurture new entrepreneurial ideas is to use it as SEED MONEY. Instead of spending millions making Bruneians lazy, why not use a fraction of the money making lots of Brunei entrepreneurs. Now BEDB could play a big role here as the agency responsible in giving seed money to the potential entrepreneurs.
Anyway, what I'm trying to say is that in 'every challenge there lies an opportunity' as there must always be 'a blessing in disguise'. This should be the slogan to any good entrepreneur. And I also wonder why should Bruneians be insulated from the effects of the global forces as I think it is unhealthy to the development of a resilient economy and a nation as a whole. It is high time, Bruneians learn to think rationally and start prioritising their lives. Not only that, I also think that a shock is probably what this sleepy country needs to revitalise its weak economy.
Salaam.
First of all, he didn't seem to acknowledge that car fuel, at times when global prices are rising, is not a necessity. True, people's lives will be affected as the cost of driving a car will go up due to a reduction in subsidy and it will also affect the prices of goods. But I believe people will react by economising not only the use of their cars but also their day to day purchases down to the level of necessity. It would certainly be a different matter, if the government were to reduce the level of subsidy on electricity (but again Bruneians DO NOT economise their electricity usage).
Now, if the government were to decide to go ahead with the slashing of the fuel subsidy, the relavant government agencies should come forward to alleviate the effects on the lives of Bruneians. Firstly, this is when Price Control should be THE active policy in regulating the prices of necessities. Price ceilings of goods which are deemed staple MUST be worked out NOW so that sellers do not take advantage of the increasing fuel price.
Secondly, the Ministry of Education and/or the Ministry of Communication for instance, should come forward in helping parents transporting their children to school. School buses have to be provided and preferably privatised. This will not only directly help the people but also can help boost the transportation industry.
According to the Minister of Energy, about B$500 million was spent on the fuel subsidy in 2005. Again, that's A LOT! The money could be spent on other productive activities including in providing the resources for the above-mentioned activities. But the one use that can directly help the weak private sector and perhaps nurture new entrepreneurial ideas is to use it as SEED MONEY. Instead of spending millions making Bruneians lazy, why not use a fraction of the money making lots of Brunei entrepreneurs. Now BEDB could play a big role here as the agency responsible in giving seed money to the potential entrepreneurs.
Anyway, what I'm trying to say is that in 'every challenge there lies an opportunity' as there must always be 'a blessing in disguise'. This should be the slogan to any good entrepreneur. And I also wonder why should Bruneians be insulated from the effects of the global forces as I think it is unhealthy to the development of a resilient economy and a nation as a whole. It is high time, Bruneians learn to think rationally and start prioritising their lives. Not only that, I also think that a shock is probably what this sleepy country needs to revitalise its weak economy.
Salaam.
"The basic difference between an ordinary man and a warrior is that a warrior takes everything as a challenge while an ordinary man takes everything either as a blessing or a curse." (Carlos Casteneda)
P.S. If you read the news, the US economy is heading more and more towards a recession. A gloomy sign to the global economy. Now, that's a BIG challenge!
Thursday, 6 December 2007
Doing Business in Brunei 2008
I actually shouldn't be posting anything until next week (as a chapter is due on Wednesday, the latest) but while browsing the internet I stumbled on the World Bank Group Doing Business Project's report on Doing Business in Brunei 2008 (Pdf file). In case I forget, I think I better post it now.
I read about this in the BB a few months ago and actually wanted to blog about it but well...other important things came up.. perhaps another time.
I haven't been able to digest what's in the report but I can see some interesting findings. My only comment for now is that Brunei is a small developing country. It is not quite fair to compare ourselves with the likes of developed countries. But it should also cannot be the reason why we shouldn't change, afterall those developed countries were not developed by chance. They also started from a humble beginning.
Enjoy reading! I'm sure it will be useful to researchers, policy-makers, students and all Bruneians in general (unless of course you don't care hehe). Oh, don't forget to save it in case it's removed.
Salaam.
I read about this in the BB a few months ago and actually wanted to blog about it but well...other important things came up.. perhaps another time.
I haven't been able to digest what's in the report but I can see some interesting findings. My only comment for now is that Brunei is a small developing country. It is not quite fair to compare ourselves with the likes of developed countries. But it should also cannot be the reason why we shouldn't change, afterall those developed countries were not developed by chance. They also started from a humble beginning.
Enjoy reading! I'm sure it will be useful to researchers, policy-makers, students and all Bruneians in general (unless of course you don't care hehe). Oh, don't forget to save it in case it's removed.
Salaam.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
