Friday, 1 August 2008

Are We Poor OR Are We Stupid?

It is sad to see and hear about the events happening in Brunei (i.e. the food clamouring and the coupon stampede) that have even result into human tragedy (courtesy to ranoadidas.com for always bringing the important news). It would be normal if it happened in a third world country, but for it to happen in Brunei, an oil-rich country, is quite extraordinary.

The question, as rightly put by Mr. Brunei Resources, is “What Happened to Bruneians?

Now, there are 2 schools of thoughts. One says that it is simply because we are poorer and the other says we are too materialistic that we don’t even know how to differentiate between what is right and what is wrong i.e we are stupid.

Unfortunately, we can never truly find out until a proper income gap analysis is carried out. It is imperative that we know how many Bruneians are poor, how poor and why they are poor. Without such analysis, then we can never know and we will only end up having the rich blaming the poor (of being immoral and shameless) and the poor blaming the system (of unfairness).

While I do not doubt the existence of those who are genuinely poor, I also believe that the pool of poor people in Brunei is also largely made-up of those self-made poor, who are spending beyond their means. Regardless of how people become poor, we need to address poverty properly. There are 2 critical issues to tackle. One, how do we lift Bruneians off their existing poverty and two, how to keep the zero poverty (if it is ever achieved).

Now, if I were an economic advisor to Brunei, these are what I would suggest:

  1. Get our statistics and figure right. We NEED to know our poverty statistics A.S.A.P.
  2. If the finding (whether this is made public or otherwise) is that there are indeed a large number of poor people in Brunei, then we really need to review our economy. If people are poor because there is no job, then we need to pump-up the economy. This is THE time to make use of the oil-money.
  3. Lifting people off poverty does not simply mean giving them money. We need to be creative in giving them the means to make money. True, this is easier said than done given the unfortunate attitude of some (most?) of Bruneians who more than many times do not see the rationale behind the self-aid help. But with proper monitoring and perhaps some taught management skill, I’m sure there will be some positive results. The key is for the relevant agency to NOT to give-up. Don’t let one bad apple ruins the whole basket.
  4. It is time to differentiate the different types of goods available in the market. There are the luxurious and there are the normal ones. The problem in Brunei is that there are too many ‘high standard’ people who will not make do with just the normal goods and then there are also too many of us who always want to keep up with the Joneses. For many of these people, the euphoria of owning the latest mobile set or a branded watch has blinded their rational judgement and has reduced their mathematical ability to calculate their monthly balance to pre-kindy level. Therefore I believe the good old system of tax can somewhat alleviate this problem of euphoria-blindness. We need to tax (highly) the luxurious goods.
  5. A credit monitoring system needs to be put in place. I cannot just go to any store and sign any credit agreement without a thorough check of my credit rating.
  6. It is time to review the TAP contribution. There is a need to increase the contribution from the employees. We need to make sure Bruneians save for their own future. And of course, since Brunei coffer by now must have filled with a lot of oil money, I would also say that the government needs also to increase its contribution into TAP not only into the account of those in the public sector but also to Bruneians in the private sector. Afterall, the money is saved for the future. This contribution from the government I believe could be the key to reduce the remuneration gap between the public-private sectors. It would help increase the attractiveness of the private sector and would (hopefully) alleviate the problem of lazy Bruneians who would rather be unemployed than do manual job.
  7. We need also to look at our system of income re-distribution. How do we re-distribute the income from the rich to the poor. While income tax may not be accepted in the near future, property tax certainly deserves some high level discussion now.
  8. I don’t know how good our police force or those in the NCB are in combating drug wars, but I pray with all my heart for them to be really good.
  9. Finally, I think too much subsidy make people too lazy.

Salaam.

7 comments:

fizza said...

Standard of living in Brunei is low compare to other Asian countries. The problem here is that, some people prefers to have the latest handphones, laptops, or any other gadgets and even cars.. Before this, we have 3 basic needs... but now, these "needs" have been added with luxury goods. correct me if im wrong, now handphones are one of the basic needs. even kids own handphone [sometimes even their hp are more up-to-date than us]
this kind of attitude must change. we must teach kids about saving...not spending..

Anonymous said...

Agreed with all your concerns, Mrs RE. I don't know if the State Mufti of Brunei Darussalam would agree with you on your Point No.9, though.

Recently, when tabling his working paper in one of the "Majlis Ilmu" (Knowledge Conventions) forums in the ICC, the Yang Berhormat Pehin Mufti said that subsidies by the government for the Rakyat are not to be questioned since they are considered as "sedekah" or alms i.e. "Amal Jariah" (charitable benefits) from His Majesty's Government. According to him with such 'alms' the nation would be blessed and protected by the Almighty from "Bala" or "Mala Petaka" (natural calamities) - "Nauzubillahiminzalik".

I think there is a ring of truth in the State Mufti's reasoning. Our beloved Prophet Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihi Wassalam (Peace be upon him) would be the BEST PRIME Example when it comes to giving "sedekah", I suppose. It is much easier for a pauper like me to emulate so whenever someone asked for money and I only have a couple of dollars in my pocket, I simply just gave 1 or 2 dollars. That was all I could give anyway.

I can understand it would have been much more difficult for a richer person with hundred dollar notes in his wallet because to give the beggar small change right away would be a problem since he only has big bills i.e 100 or 1000 or 10,000 dollar notes...

Anonymous said...

Why is it that everyone immediately blame the folks who were unfortunately in the stampede.

Are Bruneians that unique that we are immune from the basic human nature that "siapa cepat dia dapat" or survival of the fittest that is part of everyone's nature, all over the world?

What did we expect when everyone is heading for the same thing and there is no one to organize the mass? "It's ok, you go first...", "No, it's ok, you go first..." that kind of mentality?

Wake up then.

I think before we go into details analysis (economic, social and whatever else) of why this happens - consider this. With my own eyes I once saw a mass of crowd who swarmed and pushed a man to the wall - just because he was handing out movie tickets that everyone wanted. And this happened in SINGAPORE.

Income gap?

Basic human nature.

When there is a crowd, there need to be management.

Unless we know that these folks pushed down their velvet ropes and jumped queue - common sense will tell you that the people in charge did not organize these crowd.

So while policy change is due for certain things - for this particular incident all we need is for the PEOPLE IN CHARGE to realized that we cannot say "Insya Allah, it will not happened again next time" without taking the proper steps or worse, "It's fate" when such tragedy occurs.

Anonymous said...

I agree with all the points raised by RE. Point 9 is a fact, not an opinion. It is probably her most important point and should be elaborated further.

This is known by economists and social scientists as the law of unintended consequences.

When something is offered for free, demand will be high. And if supply is low, then there will be some pushing and shoving. Irrespective of the good intentions set out by the individual/government who offered it in the first place. This situation is not unique to people in Brunei.

Subsidies distort incentives. Subsidies increases the cost of effort. Subsidies make it less attractive to enter the workforce. Subsidies are regressive and reward the rich more than the poor. Subsidies shift the supply curve inwards.

Yes, we should follow the example of our beloved Prophet Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihi Wassalam (pbuh) in giving sedekah or alms i.e. Amal Jariah. But what many are missing here is a subtle point. The Prophet (pbuh)was an individual, not the Government. In fact, there is no mention of government in the Holy Book or any hadith! The role of the government should be minimal at best.

A subsidy is not the same as charity. Subsidies for basic necessities consumed by the poor, may be considered a charity. But not when its consumed by the rich, who can afford luxuries, let alone basic necessities.

Rich individuals should realize this, follow the example set by our beloved Prophet (pbuh) and give charity to the poor. Not the government.

Katie-Ella said...

All good points Rogue Economist, but I have to agree with Anonymous about crowd control. This isn't the first time this has happened, only the first time it has been openly discussed. I note that nothing has appeared in National Media or more official channels. Who was responsible for crowd control, management of the queueing system and distribution of the coupons? Which government agency, who is the minister, and the permanent secretaries? Were there no police or medical staff present at such a big event? I am not stirring up trouble, I just want to know. It's unbelievable that people have died and there is NO accountability of any kind. I hope there is some analysis of the situation going on behind the scenes, and how to prevent it happening again.

FlyBoy said...

We are stupid.

Anonymous said...

Dear Mrs RE, very well said ... every word in your article is so meaningful!!! I wish our people will start to "use" thier brain and start thinking! As regard to the incidence I beleive the "situation" Brunei's people are in (i.e. living beyond thier means, "following the jones, etc..) make us "A BEGGER". Cannot wait for you to come back, the Dept missed your contructive & provocative comments to get our management thinking!!! from Kulikang