What interests me the most, while browsing the World Trade Policy Review of Brunei, is this bit of information:
(Per cent of GDP, unless otherwise indicated)
Saving and investment 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Gross national savings 47.2 48.6 51.4 59.1 62.4
Gross domestic investment 21.3 15.1 13.5 11.4 10.4
Savings-investment gap 26.0 33.6 37.9 47.8 52.1
(sorry, I'm no good in pasting the Table. For the full set click here and I refer to Table 1.2)
The saving-investment gap is huge! And the gap is because there is too much saving and too little investment (which isn’t usually the case in many countries). Now, if you’re an economics student and using Year 1 Macroeconomics, you will know that this excessive saving means there is a capital account surplus which could lead to a glut in the economy which eventually could lead to a recession.
Now, my question is why oh why are we acting as if we do not have enough capital to move the economy? To be specific, we are acting as if we’re having a gap that is caused by too little saving and therefore needs an external financing i.e. the FDI. And I have the impression that we seem to be helpless without the FDI. Now, I’m not saying that FDI is not important and I’m sure I don’t have to enumerate the reasons why we need an FDI. What I’m trying to say is that, given the availability of excessive domestic capital, it is high time that Brunei should also place the importance of the domestic investment in the effort to diversify the economy.
Despite the excessive capital however, the private sector in Brunei is weak, both in terms of resources and expertise, to undertake any major domestic investment. Therefore it is imperative (and equally inevitable) for the government sector to assist the private sector development, in particular, to do the investing.
To tell you the truth, at the beginning I wanted to propose the establishments of government-linked companies (GLCs) the likes of Singapore, but then I remembered, we DO have GLCs! Unfortunately for some reasons our GLCs are very quiet (if not, I wouldn’t have forgotten hehe) and do not appear to be spearheading the investment efforts.
I’m sure by now, many of you will be saying that Brunei’s GLCs won’t work because their managers and Board of Directors are civil servants who lack business acumen, risk-averse, slow in decision-making and their investments mainly political as opposed to commercially motivated. TRUE! And for this precise reason, I believe we need to rejuvenate our GLCs by removing (or perhaps reducing) the number of civil servants in the companies. Let’s put true entrepreneurs and real managers. If we can’t find locals then for the love of Brunei, hire (the best money can buy) foreign experts! Because the lack of competent local human resource to drive the economy is our main problem in the first place (which is nothing to be ashamed of, given our small population and the current nature of our economy, however this does not mean that Brunei’s HR should forever be at the current state) and I don't see anything wrong in hiring foreign talents. Nevertheless, we should be using Singapore as an example. Singapore’s phenomenal economic growth is, after all, the result of its strategy of ‘state capitalism’.
Let’s face the fact, we are not exactly a foreign investment magnet and on its own, our private sector is too weak and too small to drive the economy. At the same time, our oil is depleting. Therefore, I believe the inevitable solution is for the government, through its GLCs, to assume a proactive role both in the entrepreneurial development and the economic diversification effort. For the GLCs to assume this role efficiently, they need to have adequate resources and most importantly become proper business entities which mean risk-taking and being competitive. It is time for the government to let go its domineering role in the GLCs’s decision-makings and to also take the risk. Because if it doesn’t, then the only alternative for Brunei is for us to pray (very hard) for oil to never runs dry.
Salaam.
Friday, 18 April 2008
Rejuvenate Brunei's GLCs
Labels:
business,
dilemma,
diversification,
entrepreneur,
industrial policy,
investment,
oil,
policy,
small state
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
I concur with you, emphatically. The paradox of thrift in the Bruneian context has long been a topic that has intrigued me.
While the regulations which have been set up to curb irresponsible spending and encourage saving, I am a firm believer that regulations should be set up to encourage investment.
There may be some who argue that those steps have been taken, it pains me to say that it has turned out to be somewhat ineffective.
I am eager to see what the Ministry of Industry and Primary Resources have in the pipeline after sometime last year it was announced that new financing schemes would be introduced for SMEs.
As you said the private sector also lacks expertise, and it seems to be an opportune moment for specific industry experts to impart knowledge and practices to a certain extent.
Suffice to say it would be best if all those who can play a proactive role in achieving this, not just GLCs (of course they would be an integral cog). Hopefully this will be done sooner, rather than later.
Yes! Brunei doesn't differentiate between 'wasteful' spending and 'productive' spending. In fact I'm not sure if they understand that at times when the economy is sluggish, we need (in our case, given the current weak power of disposable income to many Bruneians) an injection of government spending to help increase demand. Perhaps, 'multiplier effect' is a concept alien to many of us.
Nevertheless, Brunei must understand that 'spending' is different from 'investment'.
Is it not also rather ironic that despite the country's immense per capita wealth (and reserves), that the nation and its inhabitants have developed a "cheap" mentality, in the sense that "cheap" is best.
Sure, if we're comparing two homogeneous goods/services, choosing "cheaper" of the two is a sound choice, but the country often overlooks the fact that a lot of the time (although not all of the time), there are reasons behind the the price premium paid for a better developed product, with lower consequential running costs.
Treading back onto the topic of the private sector, I personally believe that the private sector (especially the professional services industry) has entered a vicious decline, wherein a lack of opportunity to create value leads to a "brain drain" (or a "brain not considering Brunei as a career destination to begin with"), which feeds back into a further reduction in the opportunity to create value. Agreed, the government needs to get into the act and spark new life into the system.
Hi rogueeconomist,
Can you confirm this stats about ASEAN economics growth in the year 2007. Forgot the source, I think I get it from some financial magazines or the EU economic stats website.
ASEAN economic growth in 2007:
Cambodia: 9.10%
Vietnam: 8.50%
Singapore: 7.40%
Philippines: 7.30%
Laos: 7.00%
Indonesia: 6.10%
Malaysia: 5.70%
Thailand: 4.30%
Burma: 3.50%
Brunei: 2.40%
If that is true, then its kinda worrying, as Brunei's economic growth of 3.7% in 2006 is also the lowest in ASEAN.
wahh.. good post!
Brunei needs FDI, needs more spending, needs more regulation, needs more GLCs, needs more foreign talents.. but most importantly.. it needs decision to be made....
Else, there wont be any progress
Post a Comment